Ez komoly?

Kezdőlap › Fórumok › Slackware, Slax problémák › Ez komoly?

7 bejegyzés megtekintése - 1-7 / 7
  • Szerző
    Bejegyzés
  • 2004-03-14-08:01 #1932831
    kisbetu
    Felhasználó

      Komoly?
      Mindenképpen, hiszen kiírta.

      Nagyon nem értek a lelkivilágához, de nem lehet, hogy valami extrém tûzfalbeállításokat találtál ki?
      Amúgy látszólag jól mûködik a géped?

      2004-03-14-12:01 #1932832
      Atraides
      Felhasználó

        Naná, hogy komoly 🙂 mien iptables rulez-t használsz? Lehet hogy 1xüen kitltottad a localhostot 🙂 Ami egyébként szar, mert lo nélkül nem fog menni naon sok minden. pl gnome se indul.

        2004-03-14-12:39 #1932833
        admin
        Adminisztrátor

          hi!
          iptables -hez hozza se nyultam 😯
          alapbol ilyen…
          a gnome fut, megy a net + a levelezes, nmappal egyeb gepeket tok jol latok, stb…

          2004-03-14-12:42 #1932834
          admin
          Adminisztrátor

            megn eztem a netes dhcp -tol kapott cimem, rakuldtem arra is, de tok uezt dobta.
            utana a halokartya ip -jevel detto

            ja, es gentoo stage3 GPR gentoo-sources 😀

            2004-03-14-16:15 #1932835
            Atraides
            Felhasználó

              megn eztem a netes dhcp -tol kapott cimem, rakuldtem arra is, de tok uezt dobta.
              utana a halokartya ip -jevel detto

              ja, es gentoo stage3 GPR gentoo-sources 😀

              -v vel?

              2004-03-14-17:43 #1932836
              admin
              Adminisztrátor

                lo:

                Code:
                bash-2.05b# nmap -v -sS -O 127.0.0.1

                Starting nmap 3.30 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-03-14 18:39 CET

                Host localhost (127.0.0.1) appears to be up … good.

                Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against localhost (127.0.0.1) at 18:39

                The SYN Stealth Scan took 2 seconds to scan 1644 ports.

                Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port

                All 1644 scanned ports on localhost (127.0.0.1) are: closed

                Device type: general purpose

                Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X, Novell Netware 6.X

                Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details

                TCP/IP fingerprint:

                (None)

                Nmap run completed — 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.939 seconds

                bash-2.05b#

                eth0:

                Code:
                bash-2.05b# nmap -v -sS -O 192.168.1.1

                Starting nmap 3.30 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-03-14 18:40 CET

                Host skiathos (192.168.1.1) appears to be up … good.

                Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against skiathos (192.168.1.1) at 18:40

                The SYN Stealth Scan took 1 second to scan 1644 ports.

                Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port

                All 1644 scanned ports on skiathos (192.168.1.1) are: closed

                Device type: general purpose

                Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X, Novell Netware 6.X

                Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details

                TCP/IP fingerprint:

                (None)

                Nmap run completed — 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.802 seconds

                bash-2.05b#

                neten keresztul:

                Code:
                bash-2.05b# nmap -v -sS -O 212.108.200.217

                Starting nmap 3.30 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-03-14 18:42 CET

                Host m025.salgotarjan.pool.eol.hu (212.108.200.217) appears to be up … good.

                Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against m025.salgotarjan.pool.eol.hu (212.108.200.217) at 18:42

                The SYN Stealth Scan took 1 second to scan 1644 ports.

                Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port

                All 1644 scanned ports on m025.salgotarjan.pool.eol.hu (212.108.200.217) are: closed

                Device type: general purpose

                Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X, Novell Netware 6.X

                Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details

                TCP/IP fingerprint:

                (None)

                Nmap run completed — 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.459 seconds

                bash-2.05b#

                2009-12-04-19:55 #1873074
                csaba
                Felhasználó

                  nmap kimenete:

                  Code:
                  bash-2.05b# nmap -v -sS -O 127.0.0.1

                  Starting nmap 3.30 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-03-14 01:37 CET

                  Host localhost (127.0.0.1) appears to be up … good.

                  Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against localhost (127.0.0.1) at 01:37

                  The SYN Stealth Scan took 1 second to scan 1644 ports.

                  Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port

                  All 1644 scanned ports on localhost (127.0.0.1) are: closed

                  Device type: general purpose

                  Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X, Novell Netware 6.X

                  Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details

                  TCP/IP fingerprint:

                  (None)

                  Nmap run completed — 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.733 seconds

                  bash-2.05b#

                • Szerző
                  Bejegyzés
                7 bejegyzés megtekintése - 1-7 / 7
                • Be kell jelentkezni a hozzászóláshoz.