- This topic has 30 hozzászólás, 11 résztvevő, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months telt el by
bepe79.
-
SzerzőBejegyzés
-
2007-01-31-17:43 #2089380
Parancsolj:
nmap 91.82.26.114Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-01-31 18:38 CET
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -P0
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 2.095 seconds2007-01-31-17:44 #2089381Íme:
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-01-31 18:38 CET
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -P0
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 2.145 seconds2007-01-31-17:44 #2089382Köszi. Ezek szerint tényleg minden port zárva van… mi történt a Microsoftnál???
2007-01-31-17:57 #2089383retaliator44 wrote:Köszi. Ezek szerint tényleg minden port zárva van… mi történt a Microsoftnál???Nemhogy minden port zárva van, hanem úgy tűnik hogy nincs is ilyen gép a neten.
Nem illk ám csalni:
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-01-31 18:39 CET
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -P0
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 2.077 seconds
[root@fc6 ~]# ping 91.82.26.114
PING 91.82.26.114 (91.82.26.114) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=56.5 ms
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=56.3 ms
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=3 ttl=122 time=53.0 ms
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=4 ttl=122 time=62.1 ms
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=5 ttl=122 time=59.1 ms
64 bytes from 91.82.26.114: icmp_seq=6 ttl=122 time=56.8 ms— 91.82.26.114 ping statistics —
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 53.037/57.349/62.158/2.798 ms
[root@fc6 ~]# nmap 91.82.26.114Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-01-31 18:55 CET
Interesting ports on 91.82.26.114.pool.invitel.hu (91.82.26.114):
Not shown: 1676 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
135/tcp filtered msrpc
443/tcp open https
445/tcp filtered microsoft-dsNmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 13.035 seconds
2007-01-31-18:01 #2089384Határozottan… használsz rootert?
2007-01-31-18:03 #2089385Nem, közvetlen DSL kapcsolat.
Egyébként van ilyen gép, mert ez az én IP címem, sőt a saját ping-re is válaszol(ok).2007-01-31-18:05 #2089386Na most akkor nyitva van vagy nem? Kezdem nem érteni.
2007-01-31-18:07 #2089387retaliator44 wrote:Egyébként van ilyen gépVan. Én egy kicsit stréberebben használtam a parancsot. ;D
Code:nmap -P0 -v 91.82.26.114Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-01-31 18:59 CET
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 18:59
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 18:59, 0.01s elapsed
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 18:59
Scanning 91.82.26.114.pool.invitel.hu (91.82.26.114) [1697 ports]
Discovered open port 443/tcp on 91.82.26.114
Discovered open port 80/tcp on 91.82.26.114
Increasing send delay for 91.82.26.114 from 0 to 5 due to 21 out of 69 dropped probes since last increase.
Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 18:59, 16.29s elapsed (1697 total ports)
Host 91.82.26.114.pool.invitel.hu (91.82.26.114) appears to be up … good.
Interesting ports on 91.82.26.114.pool.invitel.hu (91.82.26.114):
Not shown: 1688 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
135/tcp filtered msrpc
136/tcp filtered profile
137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
443/tcp open https
445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
4444/tcp filtered krb524Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 16.321 seconds
Raw packets sent: 1759 (77.396KB) | Rcvd: 1690 (77.740KB)2007-01-31-18:10 #2089388# nmap 91.82.26.114
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-01-31 18:56 CET
Interesting ports on 91.82.26.114.pool.invitel.hu (91.82.26.114):
(The 1658 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
PORT STATE SERVICE
21/tcp open ftp
80/tcp open http
135/tcp open msrpc
443/tcp open https
445/tcp open microsoft-dsNmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 68.829 seconds
2007-01-31-18:10 #2089389Na ne. Mindenkinek mást ad??
-
SzerzőBejegyzés
- Be kell jelentkezni a hozzászóláshoz.
legutóbbi hsz