Hozzászólások
-
Bejegyzés
-
mentsd ki a .config-ot, aztan ‘make mrproper’
es utana probald a make menuconfigot.megcsináltam az mrpropert, és maradt ugyanaz a hiba..
szerintem 2.6-os kernel bugja. mivel a kernelsourcebani .c file-t adja meg az outputban..
(regi kernel bzImage-et ugyi nem torolted?)nem töröltem… illetve már töröltem… megpróbáltam bebootolni róla, és amikor kiírja, h linux 2.4.xx akkor elkezd tölteni 2 percig, mint az õrült, aztán meg abbamarad (ezt a winya kis piros led-jérõl figyeltem), és kész… pedig 2 perc alatt már a fluxbox-on kellene lennie…
próbáltam újrafordítani, de a make menuconfig-nál pedigCode:root:/usr/src/linux-2.4.24-7# make menuconfigrm -f include/asm
( cd include; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
make -C scripts/lxdialog all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.24-7/scripts/lxdialog’
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.2/../../../libncurses.so, may conflict with libc.so.uc0
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.24-7/scripts/lxdialog’
/bin/sh scripts/Menuconfig arch/i386/config.in
Using defaults found in .config
Preparing scripts: functions, parsing………………………………………………………………………………………….done.
There seems to be a problem with the lxdialog companion utility which is
built prior to running Menuconfig. Usually this is an indicator that you
have upgraded/downgraded your ncurses libraries and did not remove the
old ncurses header file(s) in /usr/include or /usr/include/ncurses.
It is VERY important that you have only one set of ncurses header files
and that those files are properly version matched to the ncurses libraries
installed on your machine.
You may also need to rebuild lxdialog. This can be done by moving to
the /usr/src/linux/scripts/lxdialog directory and issuing the
„make clean all” command.
If you have verified that your ncurses install is correct, you may email
the maintainer
make: *** [menuconfig] Error 139
jön ki…
A webszerkesztésrõl személy szerint úgy vélekedem, hogy a legjobb a tiszta, felesleges bejegyzésektõl és sallangoktól mentes, átlátható kód.
Valószínûleg amatõr a kérdés, de nem igazán jövök rá a megoldásra:
Adott ez a soronként valahol megtalálható szöveg, amibõl csak a négy számra lenne szükségem a Total time utan:
08110210|Total time|2412|pr
Kösz!
Tot
(De mindenki volt kezdo 🙂 )állandó a helye? mármint mindig
xxxxxxxx|total time|yyyy|zz
mert akkor van a legkönnyebb dolgod… már csak 1 függvény kell (php-ban substr()… perlben is szvsz hasonló nevû)
ha nem állandó, akkor pedig az elõtte lévõ | az állandó? mert akkor ahhoz képest kell meghatározni…‘Temilenne’ ha az x-et frissítenéd?
nem nagy kalad, aztán hátha…
ha nem segít akkor tényleg bemeneti periférianyûg.. amit továbbra sem értek….x frissítés?
az nincs meg az „apt-get update” && „apt-get upgrade” kombinációval? mert azt naponta min. 2x-3x futtatom ^.^és 1 részlet a syslog-ból…
Code:jún 11 09:59:17 localhost gdm[438]: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Végzetes X hiba – :0 újraindításaJun 11 09:59:22 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Jun 11 09:59:22 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn’t access hardware directly.
mi lehet az a végzetes x hiba?
nah, akkor a kernel warning logának mai része:
Code:Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Linux version 2.6.5 (root@localhost) (gcc version 3.3.2) #11 Wed May 12 22:25:28 CEST 2004Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 – 000000000009fc00 (usable)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 – 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 – 0000000000100000 (reserved)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 – 000000000fff0000 (usable)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000fff0000 – 000000000fff3000 (ACPI NVS)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000fff3000 – 0000000010000000 (ACPI data)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 – 0000000100000000 (reserved)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 65520
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Normal zone: 61424 pages, LIFO batch:14
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Processor #0 15:2 APIC version 20
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Built 1 zonelists
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Kernel command line: root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: PID hash table entries: 1024 (order 10: 8192 bytes)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Detected 2010.543 MHz processor.
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80×25
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode… Ok.
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Calibrating delay loop… 3964.92 BogoMIPS
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz stepping 07
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Using local APIC timer interrupts.
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: calibrating APIC timer …
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ….. CPU clock speed is 2009.0657 MHz.
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ….. host bus clock speed is 100.0482 MHz.
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: tbxface-0117 [03] acpi_load_tables : ACPI Tables successfully acquired
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Parsing all Control Methods:………………………………………………………………………Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Table [DSDT](id F004) – 526 Objects with 47 Devices 155 Methods 35 Regions
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI Namespace successfully loaded at root c053aabc
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: evxfevnt-0093 [04] acpi_enable : Transition to ACPI mode successful
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: evgpeblk-0867 [06] ev_create_gpe_block : GPE 00 to 31 [_GPE] 4 regs at 0000000000000428 on int 9
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: evgpeblk-0925 [06] ev_create_gpe_block : Found 0 Wake, Enabled 8 Runtime GPEs in this block
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Completing Region/Field/Buffer/Package initialization:……………………………………………….Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Initialized 35/35 Regions 9/9 Fields 21/21 Buffers 14/14 Packages (535 nodes)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Executing all Device _STA and_INI methods:…………………………………………..
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: 50 Devices found containing: 50 _STA, 2 _INI methods
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: Transparent bridge – 0000:00:1e.0
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 *10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 *7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 *4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 *11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK0] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:07 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK1] (IRQs *3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: Using anticipatory io scheduler
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 32768K size 1024 blocksize
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: hda: Maxtor 6E040L0, ATA DISK drive
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: hdd: HL-DT-STDVD-ROM GDR8162B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: hda: max request size: 128KiB
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: hdd: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM drive, 256kB Cache, UDMA(33)
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: PCI: cache line size of 128 is not supported by device 0000:00:1d.7
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ide_scsi: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: usbcore: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ehci_hcd: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: libata: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: ata_piix: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: libata: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: sata_promise: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: libata: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: sata_sil: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: libata: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: sata_svw: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: scsi_mod: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: libata: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: sata_via: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: nvidia: module license ‘NVIDIA’ taints kernel.
Jun 11 08:11:08 localhost kernel: 0: nvidia: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 NVIDIA Kernel Module 1.0-5336 Wed Jan 14 18:29:26 PST 2004
Jun 11 08:11:17 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Jun 11 08:11:17 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn’t access hardware directly.
Jun 11 08:11:17 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Jun 11 08:11:17 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn’t access hardware directly.
Jun 11 08:12:02 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Jun 11 08:12:02 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn’t access hardware directly.
Jun 11 09:59:22 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
Jun 11 09:59:22 localhost kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn’t access hardware directly.
remélem ezzel valaki okosabb lett…
az uhu nem indítja automatikusan újra az x szervert, ha behal? mert akkor megvan, h miért dob vissza bejelentkezõképernyõre…
megpróbáltam lelõtt graf felülettel (ctrl+alt+f1) futtatni, és ott meg az opengl-lel volt baja…
van valakinek ötlete, hogy mi lehet a probléma?
[killall: a régi kernelem nem lehet visszarakni… a gyárival nem indul a rendszer, fordítani pedig nem tudok, mert sem a make menuconfig, se a make parancs nem müxik… error-hegyet dobál ki
csak azért mondom, h nehogy az legyen az elsõ kérdésed, h visszaraktam-e már a kernelt ^.^]sok szerencsét deus!
nos, akkor dobjuk fel a hangulatot…
szerintetek mit védet le a microsoft következõ alkalommal?
tippjeim: include() if(){} int main()… de netelántán bebizonyítja, hogy az operációs rendszer is az õ találmánya, csak mindenki ellopta tõle… ^.-Elegánsabb lett volna egy styles könyvtárba betenni.
A következõt írd be valahova a menu fileba:[submenu] (Saját stílusok) {Saját stílusok}
[stylesdir] /usr/share/fluxbox
[end]Ezzel az adott téma meg fog jelenni a Saját stílusok almenüben.
köszi a helpet… remélem menni fog ^.^
szerk: müxik… csúcs… a sephrioth-os theme-et használom, és iszonyat yól néz ki…
legutóbbi hsz